What Clients Found Useful About Working With Forvex

These are accounts from organisations that commissioned research reports. They describe what the reports helped with and how the findings were used internally and with advisors.

← Back to Home

180+

Reports Delivered

4.7

Average Client Rating

14

Industry Categories Covered

100%

Source-Cited Deliverables

Feedback From Organisations That Used Our Reports

AT

Amirah Tan

Brand Manager, Petaling Jaya

"We were shortlisting three candidate names for a new product line. The multi-mark report gave us comparison tables and a ranking framework we could actually use in an internal meeting before approaching our IP advisor. Saved us a round of guesswork."

April 2025 · Multi-Mark Report

KL

Kevin Lim

Director, Kuala Lumpur

"The single-name report arrived on day six. It was a properly structured PDF, not a raw data dump. The source appendix was attached so our advisor could check the underlying entries directly. A few things came up that we hadn't factored in — which was exactly the point of ordering it."

March 2025 · Single-Name Report

SR

Suraya Ramli

Operations Manager, Shah Alam

"We used the portfolio engagement ahead of a subsidiary rebrand. The scoping session was where it really started to come together — the team identified categories we hadn't considered. The milestone meetings kept things on track. Would use again for future projects."

April 2025 · Portfolio Engagement

FH

Fadzillah Hassan

Marketing Lead, Cyberjaya

"Pricing was clear from the start. The limitations section in the report was one of the most useful parts — it told me exactly what questions to bring to our IP professional rather than assuming the report had answered everything. That kind of clarity was appreciated."

March 2025 · Single-Name Report

CW

Chong Wei Kiat

Co-Founder, Subang Jaya

"Four names on the shortlist. Forvex explained the multi-mark option clearly and it made more financial sense than four separate reports. The comparison tables made it straightforward to present the landscape to our board before we committed to next steps."

May 2025 · Multi-Mark Report

NI

Nurul Izzati Mohd

Legal Affairs, Klang Valley

"From a legal affairs perspective, the source appendix was the most valuable part. Having documented references to specific register entries meant I could review the underlying data myself before presenting to external counsel. That kind of transparency isn't always standard."

April 2025 · Multi-Mark Report

How Organisations Used the Research

Case Study — 01

F&B Group, Klang Valley — Multi-Mark Report

A food and beverage group naming a new casual dining concept had five candidate names in two business categories. Filing-stage searches from their IP advisor felt premature before shortlisting.

A Multi-Mark Comparative Research Report covered all five names with comparison tables and a ranking framework, enabling the group to reduce to two preferred options before returning to their advisor.

The group entered their IP advisor meeting with a shortlist of two names and a documented basis. The advisor estimated one hour of billable discovery time was saved. Engagement took eight working days.

Case Study — 02

Professional Services Firm, KL — Portfolio Engagement

A professional services firm expanding into two new service areas needed a landscape view across three categories before committing to any brand name or filing decisions.

A six-week Portfolio Engagement with scoping interviews and two milestone meetings produced a written report with portfolio-level observations across all three categories.

The report was used as the briefing document for external IP counsel, allowing the initial session to focus on strategy rather than background information. Two of three brand concepts proceeded.

Case Study — 03

Tech Startup, Cyberjaya — Single-Name Report

An early-stage technology company had settled on a brand name internally and wanted a basic information check before spending on professional filing advice. Budget was limited.

A Brand Name Search Information Report was commissioned for RM 720. It covered relevant technology categories and was delivered on day six with a complete source appendix.

The report surfaced two similar marks in adjacent categories the founders hadn't seen. They raised these with their IP advisor and ultimately proceeded with a modified name, informed by the research.

Reach Our Team Directly

Telephone

+60 3 2148 9376

Office

Suite 27-A, Menara Worldwide
198 Jalan Bukit Bintang
55100 Kuala Lumpur

Office Hours

Mon–Fri, 9:00 am – 6:00 pm MYT

Ready to Commission a Report?

Send us a brief description of your brand naming situation. We will respond with a scope outline within one business day.